Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yanaki Milev vs Elmer Moller Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Milev vs Moller analysis and find out who is favored!
Yanaki Milev vs Elmer Moller Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Milev 1 - 0 Moller
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Milev has won 46.93% of points on their second serve, while Moller has won 46.55%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Milev, in recent form, has won 52.65% of their opponent's second serve points, while Moller has won 57.31%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.41% and 40.42% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Milev has saved 56.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Moller has saved 58.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Milev has won 56.45% of matches played (W/L 35/ 27), with Moller winning 73.26% (W/L 63/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Milev has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 75/ 47), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Moller has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 73% (W/L 66/ 25), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 35/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Milev has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.39% of matches (W/L 31/ 15), where as Moller has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.08% of matches (W/L 37/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Milev winning 1 times and Moller being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Milev winning 2 and Moller winning 1. The last match between Milev and Moller was at the M15 Antalya, 16-12-2022, Second, Clay with Yanaki Milev getting the victory 3-6 7-5 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:29:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Milev and Moller have played a deciding set 1 times, with Milev winning 1 times and Moller 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Milev winning 0, and Moller 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Milev has played against opponents with an average rank of 155.92 while Moller has played against players with an average rank of 226.35.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Milev has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Moller has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Milev has converted 49.47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Moller has converted 49.01% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
536
Rank
482
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
270
Rank
270
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
59% (80-55)
Career Total W/L
68% (118-56)
63% (22-13)
YTD W/L
74% (28-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Yanaki Milev | Elmer Moller |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:29:0 | 2:29:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 44% (48/110) | 60% (53/89) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (31/48) | 58% (31/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (29/62) | 50% (18/36) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 38% (5/13) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (40/89) | 45% (50/110) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Yanaki Milev
Player
Elmer Moller
44%
(
48 of
110)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
47%
(
29 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
50 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
100
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yanaki Milev | Elmer Moller |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (22/13) | 74% (28/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (51/34) | 69% (61/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (422/364) | 58% (465/335) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (22/11) | 78% (21/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 67% (4/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.27 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 103 | 60 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.35 |
| DFs Total | 127 | 138 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:22 | 1:40:3 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 107.66 | 308.42 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1443/2517) | 65% (1672/2557) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (991/1443) | 65% (1084/1672) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (504/1074) | 47% (412/885) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (140/283) | 49% (174/355) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1092/2467) | 48% (1222/2572) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 20% (1/4) | 75% (15/5) |
| Futures W/L | 72% (21/8) | 71% (12/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (22/35) | 74% (28/38) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 50% (3/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 53% (8/15) | 62% (8/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (24/20) | 89% (28/25) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (24/4) | 11% (28/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 30% (10/3) |
Yanaki Milev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Gorazd Srbljak
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
94
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Keisuke Saitoh
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Yanaki Milev
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Pierre Delage
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Gokberk Saritas
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Ruslan Tiukaev
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Koray Kirci
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Koray Kirci
Player
Yanaki Milev
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Yanaki Milev
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Stijn Slump
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
47%
(
48 of
102)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Elmer Moller Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Marlon Vankan
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Elmer Moller
41%
(
36 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
67 of
111)
1
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
5
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
43%
(
22 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
48%
(
42 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
59 of
111)
104
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
68%
(
68 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Carlos Taberner
73%
(
91 of
125)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
102)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
29%
(
10 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
47%
(
59 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
116
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Tom Gentzsch
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve %
54%
(
20 of
37)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
40
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Marko Topo
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Elmer Moller
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
99
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Gastao Elias
75%
(
69 of
92)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Elmer Moller
42%
(
45 of
108)
1st Serve %
72%
(
74 of
103)
5
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
49%
(
31 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
44 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
103)
107
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Milev Vs Moller Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Yanaki Milev
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
